Burnet v. Sanford & Brooks Co.

1931 United States Supreme Court case
Burnet v. Sanford & Brooks Co.
Argued December 5, 8, 1930
Decided January 5, 1931
Full case nameBurnet, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, v. Sanford & Brooks Co.
Citations282 U.S. 359 (more)
51 S. Ct. 150; 75 L. Ed. 383; 1931 U.S. LEXIS 7; 2 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) ¶ 636; 9 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 603; 1931-1 C.B. 363; 1931 P.H. P389
Case history
PriorSanford & Brooks Co. v. Commissioner, 11 B.T.A. 452 (1928); reversed, 35 F.2d 312 (4th Cir. 1929); cert. granted, 281 U.S. 707 (1930).
Holding
An annual accounting system is a practical necessity if the federal income tax is to produce revenue ascertainable and payable at regular intervals.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Charles E. Hughes
Associate Justices
Oliver W. Holmes Jr. · Willis Van Devanter
James C. McReynolds · Louis Brandeis
George Sutherland · Pierce Butler
Harlan F. Stone · Owen Roberts
Case opinion
MajorityStone, joined by unanimous
Laws applied

Burnet v. Sanford & Brooks Co., 282 U.S. 359 (1931), was a case heard before the United States Supreme Court dealing with accounting for purposes of federal income tax and the Sixteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The case held that an annual accounting system is a practical necessity if the federal income tax is to produce revenue ascertainable and payable at regular intervals.[1]

The case was decided at a time when losses could not be carried forward to future years. Since 2018, Section 172 of the Internal Revenue Code now generally allows a taxpayer to use net operating losses from previous years to deduct up to 80% of income for a given year.[2]

References

  1. ^ Burnet v. Sanford & Brooks Co., 282 U.S. 359 (1931).
  2. ^ 26 U.S.C. § 172

External links

  • Works related to Burnet v. Sanford & Brooks Company at Wikisource
  • Text of Burnet v. Sanford & Brooks Co., 282 U.S. 359 (1931) is available from: CourtListener  Findlaw  Google Scholar  Justia  Library of Congress 
  • v
  • t
  • e
Scope
IncomeTaxable
corporate dividends
  • Lynch v. Turrish (1918)
  • Southern Pacific Co. v. Lowe (1918)
  • Lynch v. Hornby (1918)
  • Peabody v. Eisner (1918)
  • Eisner v. Macomber (1920)
  • United States v. Phellis (1921)
  • Rockefeller v. United States (1921)
  • Merchants' Loan & Trust v. Smietanka (1921)
  • Miles v. Safe Deposit Co. (1922)
  • Cullinan v. Walker (1923)
  • Weiss v. Stearn (1924)
  • Marr v. United States (1925)
  • Koshland v. Helvering (1936)
  • Helvering v. Gowran (1937)
Taxable
corporate earnings
  • Edwards v. Cuba Railroad (1925)
  • Burk-Waggoner Assoc. v. Hopkins (1925)
  • Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. United States (1932)
  • Continental Tie & Lumber Co. v. United States (1932)
  • Helvering v. Mitchell (1938)
  • Helvering v. National Grocery (1938)
  • Helvering v. Northwest Steel Mills (1940)
  • Crane-Johnson Co. v. Helvering (1940)
  • Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co. (1955)
  • General American Investors Co. v. Commissioner (1955)
  • Commissioner v. Gillette Motor Co. (1960)
Taxable gains
Unlawful income
  • United States v. Sullivan (1927)
  • Rutkin v. United States (1952)
  • Commissioner v. Sullivan (1958)
  • James v. United States (1961)
Deductions
and exemptions
Diminution of loss


Stub icon

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

  • v
  • t
  • e
Stub icon

This tax-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

  • v
  • t
  • e