Pumping lemma for context-free languages

Type of pumping lemma

In computer science, in particular in formal language theory, the pumping lemma for context-free languages, also known as the Bar-Hillel lemma,[1] is a lemma that gives a property shared by all context-free languages and generalizes the pumping lemma for regular languages.

The pumping lemma can be used to construct a proof by contradiction that a specific language is not context-free. Conversely, the pumping lemma does not suffice to guarantee that a language is context-free; there are other necessary conditions, such as Ogden's lemma, or the Interchange lemma.

Formal statement

Proof idea: If s {\displaystyle s} is sufficiently long, its derivation tree w.r.t. a Chomsky normal form grammar must contain some nonterminal N {\displaystyle N} twice on some tree path (upper picture). Repeating n {\displaystyle n} times the derivation part N {\displaystyle N} ⇒...⇒ v N x {\displaystyle vNx} obtains a derivation for u v n w x n y {\displaystyle uv^{n}wx^{n}y} (lower left and right picture for n = 0 {\displaystyle n=0} and 2 {\displaystyle 2} , respectively).

If a language L {\displaystyle L} is context-free, then there exists some integer p 1 {\displaystyle p\geq 1} (called a "pumping length")[2] such that every string s {\displaystyle s} in L {\displaystyle L} that has a length of p {\displaystyle p} or more symbols (i.e. with | s | p {\displaystyle |s|\geq p} ) can be written as

s = u v w x y {\displaystyle s=uvwxy}

with substrings u , v , w , x {\displaystyle u,v,w,x} and y {\displaystyle y} , such that

1. | v x | 1 {\displaystyle |vx|\geq 1} ,
2. | v w x | p {\displaystyle |vwx|\leq p} , and
3. u v n w x n y L {\displaystyle uv^{n}wx^{n}y\in L} for all n 0 {\displaystyle n\geq 0} .

Below is a formal expression of the Pumping Lemma.

( L Σ ) ( context free ( L ) ( ( p 1 ) ( ( s L ) ( ( | s | p ) ( ( u , v , w , x , y Σ ) ( s = u v w x y | v x | 1 | v w x | p ( n 0 ) ( u v n w x n y L ) ) ) ) ) ) ) {\displaystyle {\begin{array}{l}(\forall L\subseteq \Sigma ^{*})\\\quad ({\mbox{context free}}(L)\Rightarrow \\\quad ((\exists p\geq 1)((\forall s\in L)((|s|\geq p)\Rightarrow \\\quad ((\exists u,v,w,x,y\in \Sigma ^{*})(s=uvwxy\land |vx|\geq 1\land |vwx|\leq p\land (\forall n\geq 0)(uv^{n}wx^{n}y\in L)))))))\end{array}}}

Informal statement and explanation

The pumping lemma for context-free languages (called just "the pumping lemma" for the rest of this article) describes a property that all context-free languages are guaranteed to have.

The property is a property of all strings in the language that are of length at least p {\displaystyle p} , where p {\displaystyle p} is a constant—called the pumping length—that varies between context-free languages.

Say s {\displaystyle s} is a string of length at least p {\displaystyle p} that is in the language.

The pumping lemma states that s {\displaystyle s} can be split into five substrings, s = u v w x y {\displaystyle s=uvwxy} , where v x {\displaystyle vx} is non-empty and the length of v w x {\displaystyle vwx} is at most p {\displaystyle p} , such that repeating v {\displaystyle v} and x {\displaystyle x} the same number of times ( n {\displaystyle n} ) in s {\displaystyle s} produces a string that is still in the language. It is often useful to repeat zero times, which removes v {\displaystyle v} and x {\displaystyle x} from the string. This process of "pumping up" s {\displaystyle s} with additional copies of v {\displaystyle v} and x {\displaystyle x} is what gives the pumping lemma its name.

Finite languages (which are regular and hence context-free) obey the pumping lemma trivially by having p {\displaystyle p} equal to the maximum string length in L {\displaystyle L} plus one. As there are no strings of this length the pumping lemma is not violated.

Usage of the lemma

The pumping lemma is often used to prove that a given language L is non-context-free, by showing that arbitrarily long strings s are in L that cannot be "pumped" without producing strings outside L.

For example, if S N {\displaystyle S\subset \mathbb {N} } is infinite but does not contain an (infinite) arithmetic progression, then L = { a n : n S } {\displaystyle L=\{a^{n}:n\in S\}} is not context-free. In particular, neither the prime numbers nor the square numbers are context-free.

For example, the language L = { a n b n c n | n > 0 } {\displaystyle L=\{a^{n}b^{n}c^{n}|n>0\}} can be shown to be non-context-free by using the pumping lemma in a proof by contradiction. First, assume that L is context free. By the pumping lemma, there exists an integer p which is the pumping length of language L. Consider the string s = a p b p c p {\displaystyle s=a^{p}b^{p}c^{p}} in L. The pumping lemma tells us that s can be written in the form s = u v w x y {\displaystyle s=uvwxy} , where u, v, w, x, and y are substrings, such that | v x | 1 {\displaystyle |vx|\geq 1} , | v w x | p {\displaystyle |vwx|\leq p} , and u v i w x i y L {\displaystyle uv^{i}wx^{i}y\in L} for every integer i 0 {\displaystyle i\geq 0} . By the choice of s and the fact that | v w x | p {\displaystyle |vwx|\leq p} , it is easily seen that the substring vwx can contain no more than two distinct symbols. That is, we have one of five possibilities for vwx:

  1. v w x = a j {\displaystyle vwx=a^{j}} for some j p {\displaystyle j\leq p} .
  2. v w x = a j b k {\displaystyle vwx=a^{j}b^{k}} for some j and k with j + k p {\displaystyle j+k\leq p}
  3. v w x = b j {\displaystyle vwx=b^{j}} for some j p {\displaystyle j\leq p} .
  4. v w x = b j c k {\displaystyle vwx=b^{j}c^{k}} for some j and k with j + k p {\displaystyle j+k\leq p} .
  5. v w x = c j {\displaystyle vwx=c^{j}} for some j p {\displaystyle j\leq p} .

For each case, it is easily verified that u v i w x i y {\displaystyle uv^{i}wx^{i}y} does not contain equal numbers of each letter for any i 1 {\displaystyle i\neq 1} . Thus, u v 2 w x 2 y {\displaystyle uv^{2}wx^{2}y} does not have the form a i b i c i {\displaystyle a^{i}b^{i}c^{i}} . This contradicts the definition of L. Therefore, our initial assumption that L is context free must be false.

In 1960, Scheinberg proved that L = { a n b n a n | n > 0 } {\displaystyle L=\{a^{n}b^{n}a^{n}|n>0\}} is not context-free using a precursor of the pumping lemma.[3]

While the pumping lemma is often a useful tool to prove that a given language is not context-free, it does not give a complete characterization of the context-free languages. If a language does not satisfy the condition given by the pumping lemma, we have established that it is not context-free. On the other hand, there are languages that are not context-free, but still satisfy the condition given by the pumping lemma, for example

L = { b j c k d l | j , k , l N } { a i b j c j d j | i , j N , i 1 } {\displaystyle L=\{b^{j}c^{k}d^{l}|j,k,l\in \mathbb {N} \}\cup \{a^{i}b^{j}c^{j}d^{j}|i,j\in \mathbb {N} ,i\geq 1\}}

for s=bjckdl with e.g. j≥1 choose vwx to consist only of b's, for s=aibjcjdj choose vwx to consist only of a's; in both cases all pumped strings are still in L.[4]

References

  1. ^ Kreowski, Hans-Jörg (1979). "A pumping lemma for context-free graph languages". In Claus, Volker; Ehrig, Hartmut; Rozenberg, Grzegorz (eds.). Graph-Grammars and Their Application to Computer Science and Biology. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 73. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. pp. 270–283. doi:10.1007/BFb0025726. ISBN 978-3-540-35091-0.
  2. ^ Berstel, Jean; Lauve, Aaron; Reutenauer, Christophe; Saliola, Franco V. (2009). Combinatorics on words. Christoffel words and repetitions in words (PDF). CRM Monograph Series. Vol. 27. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society. p. 90. ISBN 978-0-8218-4480-9. Zbl 1161.68043. (Also see [www-igm.univ-mlv.fr/~berstel/ Aaron Berstel's website)
  3. ^ Stephen Scheinberg (1960). "Note on the Boolean Properties of Context Free Languages" (PDF). Information and Control. 3 (4): 372–375. doi:10.1016/s0019-9958(60)90965-7. Here: Lemma 3, and its use on p.374-375.
  4. ^ John E. Hopcroft, Jeffrey D. Ullman (1979). Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages, and Computation. Addison-Wesley. ISBN 0-201-02988-X. Here: sect.6.1, p.129
  • Bar-Hillel, Y.; Micha Perles; Eli Shamir (1961). "On formal properties of simple phrase-structure grammars". Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft, und Kommunikationsforschung. 14 (2): 143–172. — Reprinted in: Y. Bar-Hillel (1964). Language and Information: Selected Essays on their Theory and Application. Addison-Wesley series in logic. Addison-Wesley. pp. 116–150. ISBN 0201003732. OCLC 783543642.
  • Michael Sipser (1997). Introduction to the Theory of Computation. PWS Publishing. ISBN 0-534-94728-X. Section 1.4: Nonregular Languages, pp. 77–83. Section 2.3: Non-context-free Languages, pp. 115–119.
  • v
  • t
  • e
Chomsky hierarchyGrammarsLanguagesAbstract machines
  • Type-0
  • Type-1
  • Type-2
  • Type-3
Each category of languages, except those marked by a *, is a proper subset of the category directly above it. Any language in each category is generated by a grammar and by an automaton in the category in the same line.