Walt Disney World Co. v. Wood

(Learn how and when to remove this message)

Walt Disney World Co. v. Wood, 489 So. 2d 61 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986) is a court decision by Florida's Fourth District Court of Appeal illustrating the principle of joint and several liability when combined with comparative negligence. It also features a unique twist in that the plaintiff and one of the defendants were (at the time of the incident giving rise to the suit) engaged, and later married.

In 1971, Aloysia Wood was injured on the Grand Prix bumper-car ride at Walt Disney World when her then-fiance, Daniel Wood, rammed his car into the rear of hers.

The jury assessed her damages at $75,000.

The jury then returned a verdict finding Aloysia Wood 14% at fault, Daniel Wood 85% at fault, and Disney 1% at fault. [1] The court (under the doctrine of joint and several liability) then ordered Disney to pay 86% of the damages - its 1% percentage plus Daniel Woods' 85% percentage - because Daniel (who was by then Aloysia's husband) was unable to pay his portion.

This case is sometimes cited in calls for tort reform.[1]

References

  1. ^ Shmit, Joan T; Oleszczuk, Timothy K; Anderson, Dan R. "An Analysis of Litigation Claiming Joint and Several Liability". The Journal of Risk and Insurance. 58 (3): 401–402. JSTOR 253399.
  • v
  • t
  • e
Intentional Torts
Assault & Battery
Abuse of process
  • Hartman v. Moore
intentional infliction of emotional distress
Trespass to land & Trespass to chattels
Conversion
Privacy, Publicity rights
Tortious interference
Defamation
Negligence
Duty of care
Medical malpractice
Wrongful death, Loss of consortium
Common employment
Public Authority, Fireman's rule, Negligence per se
Causation
Negligent infliction of emotional distress
Nuisance
Public
Private
Strict liability
Ultrahazardous activity
Product liability
Damages
Joint and several liability
  • Walt Disney World Co. v. Wood
Comparative negligence
Punitive damages